Discuz! Board

 找回密碼
 立即註冊
搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 7|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

The Supreme Court establishes doctrine on the compatibility

[複製鏈接]

1

主題

1

帖子

5

積分

新手上路

Rank: 1

積分
5
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2024-1-11 12:18:46 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
Two rulings issued by the Plenary of its Fourth Chamber explain that in order to receive 100% of the retirement pension while carrying out a self-employed activity, it is not enough to be a member of a community of property or administrator of a limited company . but it is necessary to develop an activity on your own, as an individual, and to have hired a worker. It is not enough that the employment contract was carried out by a community of property or a limited company. To encourage people to prolong their active lives, the General Social Security Law (LGSS) contemplates the so-called “ active retirement .

” This means allowing, by meeting certain requirements, whoever receives such a pension to make it compatible with a job, self-employed or employed. The general rule is that in such cases the pension is Phone Number Data collected at 50% . However, exceptionally, the Law provides that "if the activity is carried out on a self-employed basis and it is proven that at least one employee has been hired, the amount of the pension compatible with the work will reach 100 percent." ”. The cases now resolved arise as a result of the person receiving the retirement pension claiming to have hired several people through the community of property of which they are a part.



Since the condition of community member involves personally assuming the responsibilities derived from what the community of property does , pensioners considered that they have the right to “full” active retirement, that is, without a reduction in the pension. To cement their solution, dismissing the claims, the rulings examine the literal wording of the LGSS as well as the consequences of employment contracts being carried out by the community of property and not by one of its community members. By concluding that it is the community of property (not the pensioner) who appears as the employer, they rule out that in such cases there is a right to the full collection of the retirement pension.


回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

Archiver|手機版|自動贊助|GameHost抗攻擊論壇  

GMT+8, 2025-4-21 22:24 , Processed in 0.073049 second(s), 21 queries .

抗攻擊 by GameHost X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
一粒米 | 中興米 | 論壇美工 | 設計 抗ddos | 天堂私服 | ddos | ddos | 防ddos | 防禦ddos | 防ddos主機 | 天堂美工 | 設計 防ddos主機 | 抗ddos主機 | 抗ddos | 抗ddos主機 | 抗攻擊論壇 | 天堂自動贊助 | 免費論壇 | 天堂私服 | 天堂123 | 台南清潔 | 天堂 | 天堂私服 | 免費論壇申請 | 抗ddos | 虛擬主機 | 實體主機 | vps | 網域註冊 | 抗攻擊遊戲主機 | ddos |